10.1145/3461564.3461579acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicpsprocConference Proceedings
research-article

Going Beyond Empowered Design by Scaffolding Inter-community Engagement

Published:20 June 2021

ABSTRACT

When participatory technological design initiatives are focused on a very specific local context it becomes difficult to scale up their deployment to wider or different contexts. We have therefore extended the notion of empowered design and consequent technology appropriations and show that scaffolding, assistance that fades away, is a viable method to facilitate inter-community engagements with technology. This leads to technology appropriation by communities who did not participate in the original design, and they do this independently of the original academic design team. In this paper we report on our project process over an extended period of time. A collaborator and co-author on this paper is an elder from the original community who is acting to extend and adapt the technology with other, distant, communities from the same ethnic group, the ovaHimba. We particularly focus on the evolving role our collaborator took on over a number of field trips, and how our support, the scaffolding, became less and less important. His perspective is shared through translated statements and integrated into the text after our joint paper discussions.

References

  1. Janet Adekannbi, Wole M Olatokun, and Isola Ajiferuke. 2016. Predictors of traditional medical knowledge transmission and acquisition in South West Nigeria. Information Development 32, 3 (2016), 566–578.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross RefOpenURL University of Cape Town
  2. Philip E Agre. 1994. From high tech to human tech: Empowerment, measurement, and social studies of computing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3, 2 (1994), 167–195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  3. Myuri Basdew, Obert Jiri, and Paramu L Mafongoya. 2017. Integration of indigenous and scientific knowledge in climate adaptation in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems 3, 1 (2017), 56–67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross RefOpenURL University of Cape Town
  4. Hans P. Binswanger and Swaminathan Aiyar. 2003. Scaling Up Community-Driven Development: Theoretical Underpinnings and Program Design Implications. The World Bank, NA. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3039Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  5. Edwin H Blake, William David Tucker, Meryl Glaser, and Adinda Freudenthal. 2011. Deaf telephony: community-based co-design. Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction 3 (2011), 412–413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  6. Ineke Buskens. 2011. The importance of intent: Reflecting on open development for women’s empowerment. Information Technologies & International Development 7, 1(2011), pp–71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  7. F. Cabitza and C. Simone. 2013. Appropriation as neglected practice in communities: presenting a framework to enable EUD design for CoPs. ArXiv abs/1306.1752(2013), NA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  8. Michela Cozza and Antonella De Angeli. 2015. Scaling up Participatory Design. In 1st International Workshop on Socio-Technical Perspective in IS Development (STPIS’15), Vol. 1374. NA, Stockholm, Sweden, 8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  9. Andy Dearden. 2012. See no evil?: ethics in an interventionist ICTD. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. ACM, NA, 46–55. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2160680Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  10. Andy Dearden and William D. Tucker. 2015. The ethical limits of bungee research in ICTD. In 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS). IEEE, NA, 1–6. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7439430Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  11. Paul Dourish. 2003. The appropriation of interactive technologies: Some lessons from placeless documents. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 12, 4 (2003), 465–490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  12. Brigitte Faust. 2007. Implementation of tacit knowledge preservation and transfer methods. In International Conference on Knowledge Management in Nuclear Facilities. Unknown, NA, 18–21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  13. Leopoldina Fortunati. 2014. Media Between Power and Empowerment: Can We Resolve This Dilemma?The Information Society 30, 3 (May 2014), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.896676Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  14. Eric Gilbert, Karrie Karahalios, and Christian Sandvig. 2010. The network in the garden: Designing social media for rural life. American Behavioral Scientist 53, 9 (2010), 1367–1388.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross RefOpenURL University of Cape Town
  15. Martin Glisby and Nigel Holden. 2003. Contextual constraints in knowledge management theory: the cultural embeddedness of Nonaka’s knowledge-creating company. Knowledge and Process Management 10, 1 (Jan. 2003), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.158Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross RefOpenURL University of Cape Town
  16. Rob Guth. 1996. Where IS cannot tread. Computerworld 30, 4 (Jan. 1996), NA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  17. Jerome Alvin Hammersmith. 2007. Converging indigenous and western knowledge systems: Implications for tertiary education. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of South Africa.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  18. International Institute of Rural Reconstruction. 1996. Recording and Using Indigenous Knowledge: A Manual. International Institute of Rural Reconstruction, Unknown. https://books.google.com.na/books?id=NAPcygAACAAJGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  19. Gereon Koch Kapuire, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, and Edwin Blake. 2015. An insider perspective on community gains: A subjective account of a Namibian rural communities’ perception of A long-term participatory design project. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74 (2015), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.10.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  20. Gereon Koch Kapuire, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, and Edwin Blake. 2015. An insider perspective on community gains: A subjective account of a Namibian rural communities’ perception of a long-term participatory design project. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74 (2015), 124–143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  21. Gereon Koch Kapuire, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, and Edwin Blake. 2015. An insider perspective on community gains: A subjective account of a Namibian rural communities׳ perception of a long-term participatory design project. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74 (2015), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.10.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  22. Gereon Koch Kapuire, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Colin Stanley, Donovan Maasz, Michael Chamunorwa, Rune Heide Møller, Kasper Rodil, and Daniel Gonzalez-Cabrero. 2016. Technologies to promote the inclusion of Indigenous Knowledge holders in digital cultural heritage preservation. In International Conference on Culture & Computer Science. Unknown, Windhoek, Namibia, 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  23. Helena Karasti. 2014. Infrastructuring in Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1 (Windhoek, Namibia) (PDC ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661435.2661450Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  24. Haliyana Khalid and Alan Dix. 2010. Learning from the appropriation of photologs. In 2010 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr). IEEE, NA, 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1109/IUSER.2010.5716772Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross RefOpenURL University of Cape Town
  25. Thomas Ludwig, Oliver Stickel, Alexander Boden, Volkmar Pipek, and Volker Wulf. 2015. Appropriating digital fabrication technologies—a comparative study of two 3d printing communities. IConference 2015 Proceedings NA, NA (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  26. Donovan Maasz, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Colin Stanley, Kasper Rodil, and Uriaike Mbinge. 2018. A Digital Indigenous Knowledge Preservation Framework: The 7C Model—Repositioning IK Holders in the Digitization of IK. Springer Singapore, Singapore, 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7697-8_3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  27. Jan Resenga Maluleka. 2017. Acquisition, transfer and preservation of indigenous knowledge by traditional healers in the Limpopo province of South Africa. Doctor of Literature and Philosophy. University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/23792Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  28. Jan R Maluleka and Mpho Ngoepe. 2018. Turning mirrors into windows: Knowledge transfer among indigenous healers in Limpopo province of South Africa. South African Journal of Information Management 20, 1(2018), 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v20i1.918Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  29. Jan Resenga Maluleka and Patrick Ngulube. 2017. The preservation of knowledge of traditional healing in the Limpopo province of South Africa. Information Development 34, 5 (2017), 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666917723956Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross RefOpenURL University of Cape Town
  30. Gary Marsden. 2008. Toward empowered design. Computer 41, 6 (2008), 42–46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  31. G. Marsden, A. Maunder, and M. Parker. 2008. People are people, but technology is not technology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 366, 1881 (Oct. 2008), 3795–3804. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0119Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross RefOpenURL University of Cape Town
  32. Chris Muashekele, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, and Gereon Koch Kapuire. 2019. Co-Design as a Means of Fostering Appropriation of Conservation Monitoring Technology by Indigenous Communities. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities& Technologies - Transforming Communities (Vienna, Austria). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328320.3328383Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  33. Birgit Müller, Anja Linstädter, Karin Frank, Michael Bollig, and Christian Wissel. 2007. Learning from local knowledge: modeling the pastoral-nomadic range management of the Himba, Namibia. Ecological Applications 17, 7 (2007), 1857–1875.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross RefOpenURL University of Cape Town
  34. Michael Muller, Katja Neureiter, Nervo Verdezoto, Alina Krischkowsky, Anna Maria Al Zubaidi-Polli, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2016. Collaborative Appropriation: How Couples, Teams, Groups and Communities Adapt and Adopt Technologies. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW ’16 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818052.2855508Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  35. Ikujiro Nonaka. 1991. The Knowledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business Review 69, 6 (1991), 96–104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  36. Pablo-Alejandro Quinones, Stephanie D. Teasley, and Steven Lonn. 2013. Appropriation by Unanticipated Users: Looking beyond Design Intent and Expected Use. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (San Antonio, Texas, USA) (CSCW ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1515–1526. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441949Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  37. Kasper Rodil. 2015. Reflections on Visualization in Cross-Cultural Design. In At the Intersections of Traditional and Indigenous Knowledges and Technology Design. Informing Science Press, NA, 319–340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  38. Kasper Rodil and Heike Winschiers-Theophilus. 2018. Why Is She Naked?: An iterative refinement of the digitisation of ICH with the OvaHimba tribe in Namibia. International Journal of Intangible Heritage 13 (2018), 143–154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  39. Henna Salonius and Jonna Käpylä. 2013. Exploring the requirements of regional knowledge-based management. Journal of Knowledge Management 17, 4 (July 2013), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2013-0106Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross RefOpenURL University of Cape Town
  40. C E Shannon. 1949. Communication in the Presence of Noise. Proceedings of the IRE 37, 1 (1949), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1949.232969Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross RefOpenURL University of Cape Town
  41. Bruce Sherin, Brian J. Reiser, and Daniel Edelson. 2004. Scaffolding Analysis: Extending the Scaffolding Metaphor to Learning Artifacts. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13, 3 (July 2004), 387–421. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross RefOpenURL University of Cape Town
  42. Gunnar Stevens, Volkmar Pipek, and Volker Wulf. 2010. Appropriation infrastructure: mediating appropriation and production work. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC) 22, 2(2010), 58–81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  43. Cristiano Storni. 2014. The Problem of De-Sign as Conjuring: Empowerment-in-Use and the Politics of Seams. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1 (Windhoek, Namibia) (PDC ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661435.2661436Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  44. Phil Turner. 2011. Everyday Coping: The Appropriation of Technology. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (Rostock, Germany) (ECCE ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1145/2074712.2074738Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  45. Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Shilumbe Chivuno-Kuria, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Nicola J. Bidwell, and Edwin Blake. 2010. Being Participated: A Community Approach. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (Sydney, Australia) (PDC ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900443Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital LibraryOpenURL University of Cape Town
  46. Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Kasper Rodil, Tariq Zaman, Alvin Yeo, and Kasper Jensen. 2013. Mobile technologies for preservation of indigenous knowledge in rural communities. In 2013 8th International Conference on Information Technology in Asia (CITA). IEEE, NA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/CITA.2013.6637561Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross RefOpenURL University of Cape Town
  47. Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Veera Virmasalo, Marly M Samuel, Brit Stichel, and Helena E Afrikaner. 2020. Facilitating Design for the Unknown: an Inclusive Innovation Design Journey with a San Community in the Kalahari Desert. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2020). The Design Society, Oulu,Finland, 263–270. https://doi.org/10.35199/ICDC.2020.33Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross RefOpenURL University of Cape Town
  48. Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Naska Winschiers-Goagoses, Kasper Rodil, Edwin Blake, Tariq Zaman, Gereon Koch Kapuire, and Richard Kamukuenjandje. 2013. Moving away from Erindi-roukambe: Transferability of a rural community-based co-design. In 12th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries. IFIP WG 9.4: Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, Ocho Rios, Jamaica, 363–374. http://www.ifipwg94.org/abstracts-2005/doc_download/24-conference-proceedings-2013 bibtex: 2013-ifip.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  49. Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Naska Winschiers-Goagoses, Kasper Rodil, Edwin Blake, Tariq Zaman, Gereon Koch Kapuire, and Richard Kamukuenjandje. 2013. Moving away from Erindi-roukambe: Transferability of a rural community-based co-design. IFIIP WG 9(2013), 363–374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarOpenURL University of Cape Town
  50. David Wood, Jerome S. Bruner, and Gail Ross. 1976. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17, 2 (April 1976), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross RefOpenURL University of Cape Town

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format
About Cookies On This Site

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

Learn more

Got it!